An important development of the notion of “field” in linguistics is found in Karl Bühler’s Sprachtheorie (1934), and in particular in his theory of the two fields (symbolical and deictical), through which he provides a perceptual, pragmatic and social anchoring of language. In Bühler’s work, situation and context jointly determine the material space for the play of linguistic forms (Spielraum). The idea of action is the key to his notion of “field”. Only if speech is defined as an activity can one hope to arrive at a “total” object: the total field, or, rather, field of action, that connects representation and expression.
Bühler and the two-field theory. The notion of “field” in language, between philosophy and psychology
Gabriele Poole
2019-01-01
Abstract
An important development of the notion of “field” in linguistics is found in Karl Bühler’s Sprachtheorie (1934), and in particular in his theory of the two fields (symbolical and deictical), through which he provides a perceptual, pragmatic and social anchoring of language. In Bühler’s work, situation and context jointly determine the material space for the play of linguistic forms (Spielraum). The idea of action is the key to his notion of “field”. Only if speech is defined as an activity can one hope to arrive at a “total” object: the total field, or, rather, field of action, that connects representation and expression.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2019 04 07 Poole-Marina2.docx
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Traduzione
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
47.83 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
47.83 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.