University campuses are ideal environments for promoting sustainable urban mobility. However, the adoption of active and electric micromobility faces socio-demographic and behavioral barriers. This study investigates and compares the propensity of a university community to adopt e-bikes, e-scooters, and traditional bicycles as alternatives to private cars. Based on a travel survey conducted at the University of Cassino (Italy), three Ordered Logit models have been calibrated, characterized by a McFadden/Pseudo R2 of 0.0947, 0.1118, 0.1039. Explanatory variables include socio-demographics, university status, attendance, and current travel habits. Results show that off-campus students exhibit the highest propensity to adopt all three modes, whereas habitual car drivers reveal some resistances. A significant gender gap emerges, with females less likely to adopt micromobility, particularly traditional bicycles. Comparing the transport modes, e-bikes prove to be the most inclusive option: they overcome the physical fatigue barrier for extra-urban commuters and the age barrier (>45 years) that significantly limits e-scooter and traditional bike usage. Conversely, e-scooters show strong potential for last-mile connectivity among combined public transit users.
Determinants of Micromobility Adoption in University Campuses: Preliminary Findings from a Small-Scale City in Italy
Cappelli G.
;Nardoianni S.;D'Apuzzo M.;
2027-01-01
Abstract
University campuses are ideal environments for promoting sustainable urban mobility. However, the adoption of active and electric micromobility faces socio-demographic and behavioral barriers. This study investigates and compares the propensity of a university community to adopt e-bikes, e-scooters, and traditional bicycles as alternatives to private cars. Based on a travel survey conducted at the University of Cassino (Italy), three Ordered Logit models have been calibrated, characterized by a McFadden/Pseudo R2 of 0.0947, 0.1118, 0.1039. Explanatory variables include socio-demographics, university status, attendance, and current travel habits. Results show that off-campus students exhibit the highest propensity to adopt all three modes, whereas habitual car drivers reveal some resistances. A significant gender gap emerges, with females less likely to adopt micromobility, particularly traditional bicycles. Comparing the transport modes, e-bikes prove to be the most inclusive option: they overcome the physical fatigue barrier for extra-urban commuters and the age barrier (>45 years) that significantly limits e-scooter and traditional bike usage. Conversely, e-scooters show strong potential for last-mile connectivity among combined public transit users.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ID_156.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
2.91 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.91 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

