Like Victor Frankenstein’s creation and Mary Shelley’s novel, Penny Dreadful belongs to Frankenstein’s «progeny» in assembling a series of literary, para-scientific and cultural sources that, in the end, successfully fit together, so as to «prosper». John Logan’s interest in those who deviate from the social, sexual and cultural norm is thus coherent with Mary Shelley’s decision to let the «daemon» speak and to express his point of view (as the Creature does at length in the course of the novel), so that in her novel she lets «the subaltern speak».
“(Dis)assembling the Creature: From Frankenstein to Penny Dreadful”
Saverio Tomaiuolo
2022-01-01
Abstract
Like Victor Frankenstein’s creation and Mary Shelley’s novel, Penny Dreadful belongs to Frankenstein’s «progeny» in assembling a series of literary, para-scientific and cultural sources that, in the end, successfully fit together, so as to «prosper». John Logan’s interest in those who deviate from the social, sexual and cultural norm is thus coherent with Mary Shelley’s decision to let the «daemon» speak and to express his point of view (as the Creature does at length in the course of the novel), so that in her novel she lets «the subaltern speak».File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tomaiuolo Frankenstein and Penny Dreadful (La questione Romantica) 2022.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Contributo
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.13 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.13 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.