The legal representative cannot express consent to marriage in the name and on behalf of the incompetent. The evolution of doctrine and jurisprudence in the field of health treatments prevents the legal repre-sentative from exercising substitutive powers involving the freedom of marriage. The admissibility of substitution mechanisms based on the «presumed will» of the interested party, indeed, seems to be justified on-ly for necessary acts, which do not tolerate limits, as a direct expression of the human person.
In tema di impossibilità del matrimonio ‘in nome e per conto’ del beneficiario
Immacolata Prisco
2021-01-01
Abstract
The legal representative cannot express consent to marriage in the name and on behalf of the incompetent. The evolution of doctrine and jurisprudence in the field of health treatments prevents the legal repre-sentative from exercising substitutive powers involving the freedom of marriage. The admissibility of substitution mechanisms based on the «presumed will» of the interested party, indeed, seems to be justified on-ly for necessary acts, which do not tolerate limits, as a direct expression of the human person.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2) 2021. I. Prisco, In tema di impossibilità del matrimonio, DSF.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
150.79 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
150.79 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
