The present work compares two numerical tools to predict the geometrical deviations of an assembly constituted by thin laminates in composite material. The first one is based on a virtual representation of both the manufacturing and the assembling processes, able to generate the variability meta-model for each component to be used in a skin-based assembly. The second one estimates the sensitivity matrix that connects the components’ variations to the assembly’s variations in the method of influence coefficients (MIC). They were experimentally verified on a case study. The comparison underlined the critical issue of both the tools.

Two numerical tools for geometrical deviation management in composite assemblies: a comparison

Polini W.
;
Corrado A.
2021-01-01

Abstract

The present work compares two numerical tools to predict the geometrical deviations of an assembly constituted by thin laminates in composite material. The first one is based on a virtual representation of both the manufacturing and the assembling processes, able to generate the variability meta-model for each component to be used in a skin-based assembly. The second one estimates the sensitivity matrix that connects the components’ variations to the assembly’s variations in the method of influence coefficients (MIC). They were experimentally verified on a case study. The comparison underlined the critical issue of both the tools.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11580/84063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
social impact