The work critically retraces the jurisprudence’s prevailing position that disclaims the enforceability, in legal set-off, of credits ascertained by a provisional executable court judgment, which has not the authority of res judicata. The comparison with the legal rule and its underlying ratio legis, as well as a correct balancing of involved interest, lead to exclude that in legal set-off credits must be definite, even in trial.
Sulla certezza del credito nella compensazione legale
Immacolata Prisco
2015-01-01
Abstract
The work critically retraces the jurisprudence’s prevailing position that disclaims the enforceability, in legal set-off, of credits ascertained by a provisional executable court judgment, which has not the authority of res judicata. The comparison with the legal rule and its underlying ratio legis, as well as a correct balancing of involved interest, lead to exclude that in legal set-off credits must be definite, even in trial.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
11_I Prisco, Le Corti sal 2_2015.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
361.48 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
361.48 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
