Fabio Ravagnani1 comments on some recent (and less recent) articles I have written on classical-type theory (mainly D’Orlando, 2005, but also D’Orlando, 1997, and D’Orlando & Nistico` , 2000), criticizing the results I reach in those papers and disagreeing in particular with my overall evaluation of the relevance of the theory. I contend that Ravagnani’s critiques are not well-founded. I note at the outset that I have already clarified many of these issues in a paper to which he does not refer, although it was published in time for his consideration (see D’Orlando, 2007). I will, however, take this opportunity to try to define my position better, and in fewer words.

Reply to Ravagnani

D'ORLANDO, Fabio
2012

Abstract

Fabio Ravagnani1 comments on some recent (and less recent) articles I have written on classical-type theory (mainly D’Orlando, 2005, but also D’Orlando, 1997, and D’Orlando & Nistico` , 2000), criticizing the results I reach in those papers and disagreeing in particular with my overall evaluation of the relevance of the theory. I contend that Ravagnani’s critiques are not well-founded. I note at the outset that I have already clarified many of these issues in a paper to which he does not refer, although it was published in time for his consideration (see D’Orlando, 2007). I will, however, take this opportunity to try to define my position better, and in fewer words.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11580/22112
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
social impact