Background/Objectives: Pediatric flexible flatfoot is a common developmental variation, and treatment is generally considered when pain or functional limitations are present. This systematic review evaluated clinical and biomechanical evidence for sensorimotor insoles in children with flexible flatfoot and contextualized these findings alongside evi-dence for conventional foot orthoses and exercise-based rehabilitation; head-to-head com-parative evidence was not assumed when unavailable. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, comprehensive searches were performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed Central up to August 2026. Eligible primary studies com-prised randomized controlled trials, randomized comparative or sequence trials, prospec-tive comparative or pre-post studies, and longitudinal cohort studies evaluating pain, function, gait, balance, posture, or neuromuscular outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and the certainty of the evidence was summarized qualitatively using GRADE. Results: Ten main clinical studies met inclusion criteria, in-cluding 5 RCTs and 5 non-randomized studies, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 weeks to 2 years. Both customized supportive orthoses and intrinsic muscle exercises con-sistently reduced pain and improved function in symptomatic children in the short- to medium-term. Direct randomized evidence for sensorimotor insoles suggests potential functional and neuromuscular effects; however, the limited evidence base does not sup-port firm conclusions about comparative effectiveness or superiority over supportive or-thoses. Evidence for permanent structural arch correction was not established. Conclu-sions: In symptomatic pediatric flexible flatfoot, conservative treatment should prioritize pain and function. Conventional supportive orthoses and targeted exercise have a broader evidence base, whereas current evidence is insufficient to establish the superiority of sen-sorimotor insoles.

Sensorimotor Insoles in Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot: A Systematic Review with Contextual Comparison to Conventional Orthoses and Exercise-Based Rehabilitation

Marco Giordano;Alessia Poggiaroni;Francesco Falciglia;Angelo Gabriele Aulisa
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pediatric flexible flatfoot is a common developmental variation, and treatment is generally considered when pain or functional limitations are present. This systematic review evaluated clinical and biomechanical evidence for sensorimotor insoles in children with flexible flatfoot and contextualized these findings alongside evi-dence for conventional foot orthoses and exercise-based rehabilitation; head-to-head com-parative evidence was not assumed when unavailable. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, comprehensive searches were performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed Central up to August 2026. Eligible primary studies com-prised randomized controlled trials, randomized comparative or sequence trials, prospec-tive comparative or pre-post studies, and longitudinal cohort studies evaluating pain, function, gait, balance, posture, or neuromuscular outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and the certainty of the evidence was summarized qualitatively using GRADE. Results: Ten main clinical studies met inclusion criteria, in-cluding 5 RCTs and 5 non-randomized studies, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 weeks to 2 years. Both customized supportive orthoses and intrinsic muscle exercises con-sistently reduced pain and improved function in symptomatic children in the short- to medium-term. Direct randomized evidence for sensorimotor insoles suggests potential functional and neuromuscular effects; however, the limited evidence base does not sup-port firm conclusions about comparative effectiveness or superiority over supportive or-thoses. Evidence for permanent structural arch correction was not established. Conclu-sions: In symptomatic pediatric flexible flatfoot, conservative treatment should prioritize pain and function. Conventional supportive orthoses and targeted exercise have a broader evidence base, whereas current evidence is insufficient to establish the superiority of sen-sorimotor insoles.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11580/128243
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact