The Supreme Court confirms its case-law on the right to be forgotten online and on the necessary balance between such right and freedom of press, both conceived not as absolute rights, but rather as pre-vailing or losing depending on the circumstances of each case. Within this balance, de-indexing often rep-resents an adequate remedy to reconcile the needs of the interested party to be forgotten with the opposite rights to information and historical memory of facts.
Diritto all'oblio e deindicizzazione
Immacolata Prisco
2024-01-01
Abstract
The Supreme Court confirms its case-law on the right to be forgotten online and on the necessary balance between such right and freedom of press, both conceived not as absolute rights, but rather as pre-vailing or losing depending on the circumstances of each case. Within this balance, de-indexing often rep-resents an adequate remedy to reconcile the needs of the interested party to be forgotten with the opposite rights to information and historical memory of facts.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
prosci_tecnologie (1).pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.75 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.75 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
